Platelet transfusions in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell allograft candidates: Protecting HLA-A and HLA-B antigens through eplet analysis.

In patients awaiting an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, platelet transfusion is a risk factor for anti-HLA class I immunization because the resulting donor-specific antibodies complicate the allograft process. The objective of the present study was to determine the feasibility of a novel eplet-based strategy for identifying HLA class I mismatches between potential donors and the recipient when pre-allograft platelet transfusions were required. We included 114 recipient/haploidentical relative pairs. For each pair, we entered HLA-class I typing data into the HLA Eplet Mismatch calculator, defined the list of mismatched eplets (for the recipient versus donor direction) and thus identified the shared HLAs to be avoided. Using this list of HLAs, we defined the theoretical availability of platelet components (PCs) by calculating the virtual panel-reactive antibody (vPRA). We also determined the number of PCs actually available in France by querying the regional transfusion centre's database. The mean ± standard deviation number of highly/moderately exposed eplets to be avoided in platelet transfusions was 5.8 ± 3.3, which led to the prohibition of 38.5 ± 2 HLAs-A and -B. Taking into account the mismatched antigens and the eplet load, the mean ± standard deviation theoretical availability of PCs (according to the vPRA) was respectively 34.49% ± 1.95% for HLA-A and 80% ± 2.3% for HLA-B. A vPRA value below 94.9% for highly or moderately exposed eplets would predict that 10 PCs were actually available nationally. Although epitope protection of HLA molecules is feasible, it significantly restricts the choice of PCs.

Calcium state estimation by total calcium: the evidence to end the never-ending story.

Background Total blood calcium (TCa) is routinely used to diagnose and manage mineral and bone metabolism disorders. Numerous laboratories adjust TCa by albumin, though literature suggests there are some limits to this approach. Here we report a large retrospective study on agreement rate between ionized calcium (iCa) measurement and TCa or albumin-adjusted calcium measurements. Methods We retrospectively selected 5055 samples with simultaneous measurements of iCa, TCa, albumin and pH. We subgrouped our patients according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin levels and pH. We analyzed each patient's calcium state with iCa as reference to determine agreement rate with TCa and albumin-adjusted calcium using Payne, Clase, Jain and Ridefelt formulas. Results The Payne formula performed poorly in patients with abnormal albumin, eGFR or pH levels. In patients with low albumin levels or blood pH disorders, Payne-adjusted calcium may overestimate the calcium state in up to 80% of cases. Similarly, TCa has better agreement with iCa in the case of hypoalbuminemia, but performed similarly to the Payne formula in patients with physiological albumin levels. The global agreement rate for Clase, Jain and Ridefelt formulas suggests significant improvement compared to Payne calcium adjustment but no significant improvement compared to TCa. Conclusions Total and albumin-adjusted calcium measurement leads to a misclassification of calcium status. Moreover, accurate calcium state determination depends on blood pH levels, whose measurement requires the same pre-analytical restrictions as iCa measurement. We propose that iCa should instead become the reference method to determine the real calcium state.